For organizations with 500+ employees

The Open Source SharePoint Alternative

Replace SharePoint as the employee intranet when its operating model no longer fits. Keep Teams, Outlook, OneDrive, Office, and Microsoft sign-in. Move the intranet experience — not your entire Microsoft workplace.

  • SharePoint Online may already be included in Microsoft 365
  • SharePoint Server 2016 and 2019 support ended on 14 July 2026
  • Open source with no user or device CALs
Open Intranet homepage with company news, shortcuts, and employee content
The licensing facts — August 2026

SharePoint has three very different starting points

A fair comparison begins with what you already license and which SharePoint version you run. There is no universal license-saving figure that applies to every organization.

01

SharePoint Online may cost nothing extra

SharePoint is included in many Microsoft 365 and Office 365 plans. If every intended intranet user already has an eligible plan, the incremental SharePoint Online license cost may be zero.

02

Server 2016 and 2019 are out of support

Microsoft support for SharePoint Server 2016 and 2019 ended on 14 July 2026. Keeping either version means running an unsupported platform, not avoiding a migration decision.

03

On-premises continues as Subscription Edition

Microsoft still supports SharePoint on-premises through Subscription Edition. It uses the Server/CAL model and requires active Software Assurance or subscription rights for the server and CALs.

Choose from your real position

When should SharePoint stay — and when should it go?

The answer depends less on a headline price and more on your existing entitlements, current server version, required integrations, and desired level of control.

SharePoint

Keeping SharePoint is likely the better fit when

  • Eligible Microsoft 365 licenses already cover the whole audience and SharePoint Online meets the brief.
  • Native Teams, OneDrive, Power Platform, Purview, and Viva integration is the overriding priority.
  • Standard Microsoft templates and governance are more valuable than a deeply tailored employee experience.
  • You require Microsoft on-premises technology and are prepared to operate Subscription Edition with Server/CAL licensing.
Open Intranet

Replacing SharePoint is likely the better fit when

  • Your SharePoint Server 2016 or 2019 farm must migrate and you do not want another SharePoint commitment.
  • You need a branded employee experience, custom workflows, or industry-specific integrations beyond the Microsoft template model.
  • Your organization needs control over hosting, data location, source code, and the product roadmap.
  • The intranet audience extends beyond people who otherwise need Microsoft 365 or SharePoint access rights.

SharePoint can be the cheapest license line and still be the wrong operating model. Compare the total platform decision, not one isolated SKU.

Feature comparison

Open Intranet vs SharePoint

Both platforms cover core intranet needs. The material differences are entitlement, hosting, lifecycle, extensibility, and who controls the roadmap.

Access model

Open Intranet

Open source; no user or device CALs

SharePoint

Online often bundled in M365; Server uses Server/CAL

Hosting

Open Intranet

Linux, your cloud, managed cloud, or on-premises

SharePoint

Microsoft cloud or Subscription Edition on Windows Server

Documents

Open Intranet

Versioning, metadata, permissions, full-text search

SharePoint

Advanced Microsoft 365 document libraries

News & engagement

Open Intranet

News, comments, likes, targeting, must-read tracking

SharePoint

SharePoint News, targeting, Viva integrations

Employee directory

Open Intranet

Fully configurable profiles and filters

SharePoint

Microsoft 365 and Entra ID profiles

Lifecycle

Open Intranet

Open codebase with an independent upgrade path

SharePoint

Server 2016/2019 unsupported; Subscription Edition supported

Workflows

Open Intranet

Custom Drupal workflows and forms without CAL tiers

SharePoint

Power Automate and Power Apps within Microsoft entitlements

Microsoft identity

Open Intranet

Microsoft SSO, SAML, OAuth, LDAP/AD

SharePoint

Native Entra ID integration

Source code & roadmap

Open Intranet

Full access and independent development

SharePoint

Controlled by Microsoft

A working intranet, not a framework

Replace SharePoint with a product — not a blank framework

Open Intranet ships with the capabilities employees use every day. The difference is that your organization can adapt the experience, integrations, and codebase without waiting for one vendor’s roadmap.

Document repository in Open Intranet

Document repository

Structured documents with metadata, categories, version history, access control, and full-text search.

Company news listing in Open Intranet

Company news

Targeted news, pinned announcements, comments, likes, related files, and a searchable archive.

Employee directory in Open Intranet

Employee directory

Search and filter people by department, location, role, skills, or any custom profile field.

Forms and workflow tools in Open Intranet

Forms and workflows

Build requests, approvals, service desks, feedback forms, and multi-step business processes.

Works with your Microsoft environment

Move the intranet. Keep the Microsoft tools that still earn their place.

Open Intranet becomes the employee-facing layer. Employees can still sign in with Microsoft identities and continue using Teams, Outlook, OneDrive, and Office where those tools add value.

  • Microsoft SSO through SAML 2.0 or OAuth
  • LDAP and Active Directory synchronization
  • REST and JSON APIs for Microsoft 365 and business-system integrations
  • Flexible links and embedded experiences for existing tools
Build the business case honestly

Compare the cost you will actually change

There is no defensible universal savings number. Start with your current entitlements and architecture, then compare the full operating model over the same period.

Scenario 1

You already license eligible Microsoft 365 plans

The additional SharePoint Online license cost may be zero.

  • Do not add standalone SharePoint Plan 1 a second time.
  • Compare implementation, governance, customization, integrations, and ongoing administration.

Scenario 2

You run SharePoint Server 2016 or 2019

Microsoft support ended on 14 July 2026.

  • Compare migration to Subscription Edition with migration to Open Intranet.
  • Include server and CAL rights, Windows and SQL, infrastructure, patching, and operations.

Scenario 3

You are licensing a new intranet audience

Count only the access rights that audience actually needs.

  • SharePoint may require an eligible Online entitlement or Server CAL for each internal user or device.
  • Open Intranet has no software license fee or CAL tied to the number of users.

Use the same cost frame for both options

Model the costs that exist in your organization instead of multiplying one public SKU by headcount.

Access rights

Existing Microsoft entitlements, standalone Online plans, Server CALs, or no per-user software fee.

Platform rights

Server subscription and Software Assurance where applicable, plus the open source license position.

Infrastructure

Cloud or data-center compute, storage, backups, monitoring, Windows, Linux, and SQL where required.

Change programme

Discovery, information architecture, design, migration, testing, training, and launch.

Extensions

Custom workflows, integrations, search, branding, and future change requests.

Operations

Patching, security updates, support, governance, analytics, and continuous improvement.

Open Intranet can be cheaper, more expensive, or comparable. Its durable advantage is that user count does not change the software license fee and your organization controls the deployment and codebase.

A controlled replacement path

Replace SharePoint without replacing Microsoft 365

Treat the intranet, identity, collaboration tools, documents, and integrations as separate decisions. Preserve what works and migrate only what needs to move.

01

Establish the baseline

Confirm licenses, server versions, sites, content, permissions, integrations, owners, and the real cost of current operations.

02

Design the target

Decide what Open Intranet replaces, what remains in Microsoft 365, and how identity, documents, and links connect.

03

Pilot and migrate

Build a production-like pilot, move content in controlled batches, map permissions, and validate with business owners.

04

Launch and improve

Train editors, monitor adoption, retire the old intranet safely, and improve from real employee behaviour.

FAQs

SharePoint alternative? Start with the practical questions.

The licensing, lifecycle, and migration questions IT and Internal Communications teams should resolve before shortlisting a replacement.

Is SharePoint already included in Microsoft 365?
Often, yes. Microsoft lists SharePoint as included in many Business, Enterprise, Office 365, and Frontline plans. If the entire intranet audience already has eligible entitlements, SharePoint Online may have no additional license cost. Confirm the exact contract and feature level before modelling TCO.
Has Microsoft ended support for on-premises SharePoint?
Not entirely. Support for SharePoint Server 2016 and 2019 ended on 14 July 2026. SharePoint Server Subscription Edition remains supported under the Modern Lifecycle Policy.
Did SharePoint Server have per-user charges?
Yes. SharePoint Server uses the Server/CAL model: a server license for each running instance plus a CAL for each internal user or device, unless equivalent access rights are supplied by another eligible Microsoft license. External and public access follow different rules.
Can Open Intranet work with Microsoft 365?
Yes. Open Intranet replaces SharePoint as the employee-facing intranet while Microsoft identities can continue to provide SSO. Teams, Outlook, OneDrive, and Office can remain in use and connect through links, embeds, and APIs.
Can you migrate content from SharePoint?
Yes. A migration can include documents, lists, users, permissions, metadata, and selected content structures. The exact scope depends on the source architecture and is defined during an audit before implementation.
When is SharePoint still the better choice?
SharePoint is often the stronger choice when eligible Microsoft licenses already cover the audience, standard SharePoint experiences meet the requirements, native Microsoft integration is the top priority, and the organization prefers Microsoft’s SaaS or supported Subscription Edition operating model.
Have another question? Talk to our team

Make the SharePoint decision from your real starting point

Book a focused 30-minute session. We will review your Microsoft entitlements, SharePoint version, audience, migration scope, and control requirements before recommending a path.